Discussion:
Quote of the Year
(too old to reply)
303
2008-07-21 07:39:03 UTC
Permalink
http://www.aetherometry.com/Electronic_Publications/Politics_of_Science/Antiwikipedia/Section_III_4.html

Perhaps the reader should be reminded, at this point, that Wikipedia
determines what is Science, by counting the number of Google hits...
303
2008-07-21 08:13:05 UTC
Permalink
http://www.aetherometry.com/Electronic_Publications/Politics_of_Science/Antiwikipedia/Section_III_6.html

In light of the preceding, one is bound to conclude that Wikipedia is
a hoax: a hoax as peer-review; a hoax as an encyclopedia; a hoax as an
impartial source. And what is more, it is also a barbaric campaign of
slander, libel and defamation. All in the name of the people,
community, open source, democracy, majority, Big Science and the like.
Fascists are, at long last, at home in the world of cyberpower.
Wikipedia is at the forefront of 'Knowledge Warfare', precisely
because it has become a loutish tool of cyberfascism.
b***@gmail.com
2008-07-21 11:18:16 UTC
Permalink
http://www.aetherometry.com/Electronic_Publications/Politics_of_Scien...
In light of the preceding, one is bound to conclude that Wikipedia is
a hoax: a hoax as peer-review; a hoax as an encyclopedia; a hoax as an
impartial source.  And what is more, it is also a barbaric campaign of
slander, libel and defamation. All in the name of the people,
community, open source, democracy, majority, Big Science and the like.
Fascists are, at long last, at home in the world of cyberpower.
Wikipedia is at the forefront of 'Knowledge Warfare', precisely
because it has become a loutish tool of cyberfascism.
That very much summarises WP pages on Bahaism.
The Blue Fiddle
2008-07-21 11:56:03 UTC
Permalink
http://www.aetherometry.com/Electronic_Publications/Politics_of_Scien...
In light of the preceding, one is bound to conclude that Wikipedia is
a hoax: a hoax as peer-review; a hoax as an encyclopedia; a hoax as an
impartial source. And what is more, it is also a barbaric campaign of
slander, libel and defamation. All in the name of the people,
community, open source, democracy, majority, Big Science and the like.
Fascists are, at long last, at home in the world of cyberpower.
Wikipedia is at the forefront of 'Knowledge Warfare', precisely
because it has become a loutish tool of cyberfascism.
BB That very much summarises WP pages on Bahaism.

TBF Poor wee diddums! Such nasty people ... they did not let you spew your
vomitus all over Wilipedia!
Not to worry ... there's lot of other places you haven't tried ... let's see
if we can suggest a few ... the middle of the M25 at rush hour ... Shark
Island (preferably in the water) ... the Bermuda Triangle .... a naturist
rally at the South Pole (although your wee bits might fall off, not that
that should deter your fanaticism) ... or ... the one you missed - the
recent Papal shindig at Sydney where you ought to have been waving a placard
saying "The Pope is the Anti-Christ" ...
Death to Haifan Bahaism
2008-07-22 03:57:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by b***@gmail.com
That very much summarises WP pages on Bahaism.
It also summarizes the bahaim presence throughout wikipedia as a
whole. For example, they are attempting to utilize every conceivable
article of a religious nature they are able to put their hands on,
with a propaganda stamp of the haifan bahaim creed. Case in point an
article on the northern Buddhist figure of Maitreya,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maitreya

How any insertion of bahai into an article about Maitreya is remotely
relevant or credible to a valid entry on the subject per se, only the
warped mind of a bahaim and falsifying wikipedian cabal-ist can
possibly understand. But it appears that such gratuitous
propagandizing is allowed by the wikipedia in-group so long as you are
part of the wikipedia in-group. This absolute deception on a grand
scale.

W
Death to Haifan Bahaism
2008-07-22 08:24:01 UTC
Permalink
http://www.kapitalism.net/thoughts/wikipedia.htm

“Wikipedia has become the McDonalds/Microsoft/Walmart of information.
It provides reliably mediocre information at a low, low cost. This
drives competitors out of business, reduces diversity, and lowers the
standards all across the board. Just as McDonald's is where you go
when you're hungry but don't really care about the quality of your
food, Wikipedia is where you go when you're curious but don't really
care about the quality of your knowledge. It reeks of apathy and
superficiality.”

A bogus Walmart-McDonalds creed such haifan bahaim gets a loud speaker
at a bogus Walmart-McDonalds pseudo-encyclopedia known as wikipedia.
QED

W
Death to Haifan Bahaism
2008-07-22 08:32:52 UTC
Permalink
http://www.kapitalism.net/thoughts/wikipedia.htm

"As with similar organizations, which claim to be moral (but are not);
Wikipedia’s most important decisions are decided by feudal decree
(rather than the consensus democracy which the site claims is
existent). Wiki politics are dominated by personal attacks (rather
than the “Wikilove” which proponents gush on about), and Wiki articles
tend to be dominated by a narrow clique of self-proclaimed experts
(rather than by peer-review, as the site proclaims). In essence, the
Wikipedia is ruled by the tyranny of its owner, the former
pornographer Mr. Jimbo Wales (who dishonestly accepts donations from
the public, which trusts him to behave better); and via him, by a
pyramidal group of his Freudianesque disciples. Now, on most websites
this is not an issue; after all, I am a tyrant here at kapitalism.net;
but, and this is an important point, kapitalism.net is not pretending
to be some new-age website of ‘freedom, learning, consensus, and
discussion’. User: GrahamN sums up the situation rather nicely,
“Wikipedia is now like a totalitarian nightmare from Kafka.”

In China, the neo-leftists have come to denounce what they refer to as
‘bogus Western democracy’; the Wikipedia exemplifies this trend of
passing off a pyramidal republican cabal as some sort of democratic
organization. Really, with all the hidden-agendas, propaganda, and
reprisals against dissenters; the website has the atmosphere of a cult
or totalitarian police-state, rather than that of an encyclopedia or
academic institution. Of course, tools (of the regime) will argue that
“there is no cabal”; yet, on a website dominated by an elite group
(with special administrative powers); where dissenters are banned
without warning; where there is no judicial review, legal
representation, standards of justice, or even presumption of innocence
(which the policy pages explicitly denounce); where the burden of
proof lies entirely upon the defendant (assuming the defendant is not
a member of the controlling minority); and where complaints against
the ‘leaders’ are routinely moved, altered, minimized, and/or deleted
– how can there be anything but a cabal?"

No wonder Haifan Bahaim thrive in such a place. They are cut from the
same cloth. Seems like the anti-Wikipedia screed monkeys - to use
HamHead's phrase - are rearing their heads everywhere against a former
pornographer's enterprise in falsifying truth and facts. Founder Jimbo
Wales, the former pornographer, and Mirza Husayn Ali Nari share a lot
in common.

W
The Blue Fiddle
2008-07-21 11:45:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by 303
http://www.aetherometry.com/Electronic_Publications/Politics_of_Science/Antiwikipedia/Section_III_6.html
In light of the preceding, one is bound to conclude that Wikipedia is
a hoax: a hoax as peer-review; a hoax as an encyclopedia; a hoax as an
impartial source. And what is more, it is also a barbaric campaign of
slander, libel and defamation. All in the name of the people,
community, open source, democracy, majority, Big Science and the like.
Fascists are, at long last, at home in the world of cyberpower.
Wikipedia is at the forefront of 'Knowledge Warfare', precisely
because it has become a loutish tool of cyberfascism.
Wow! Sounds just like Bayanic.com and its weird and wonderless supporters.
303
2008-07-22 09:41:36 UTC
Permalink
On Jul 21, 9:45 pm, "The Blue Fiddle"
Post by The Blue Fiddle
Wow! Sounds just like Bayanic.com and its weird and wonderless supporters.
You must have bayanic.com confused with this site below) since you
personally cannot even read or understand 7/8 of the content on
bayanic.com. This is the site you are thinking of:
http://www.bahai.org/

W
The Blue Fiddle
2008-07-22 12:50:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by 303
On Jul 21, 9:45 pm, "The Blue Fiddle"
Post by The Blue Fiddle
Wow! Sounds just like Bayanic.com and its weird and wonderless supporters.
You must have bayanic.com confused with this site below) since you
personally cannot even read or understand 7/8 of the content on
bayanic.com.
Not confused at all ... cannot read the contents, hence have no interest in
reading the contents and regard anybody who tries to back up an argument (on
an English speaking list) by reference to bayanic.com as being sadly
deficient up top where it counts. You're a bit like the scientist who
pulled all the legs off a caterpillar and concluded, because it ignored his
command to move, that, having its legs removed made a caterpillar go deaf.
You certainly did not write that gag ... but you inspired it ... and that's
your sole claim to fame!

All Bad
2008-07-21 16:07:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by 303
http://www.aetherometry.com/Electronic_Publications/Politics_of_Science/Antiwikipedia/Section_III_4.html
Perhaps the reader should be reminded, at this point, that Wikipedia
determines what is Science, by counting the number of Google hits...
Don't you see the galactic misalignment in this? The Etherfolk of the
massless energy are beaming in from Deep Space Nine. You, on the other
hand, are clearly coming in from Babylon 5. There is no space time
continuum between these two, you edjeet!

DS9 in Star Trek domain:
http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/DS9/

Babylon 5 is in the Warner Brothers Domain!
http://babylon5.warnerbros.com/index2.html

- All Bad
303
2008-07-22 00:44:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by All Bad
http://www.aetherometry.com/Electronic_Publications/Politics_of_Scien...
Perhaps the reader should be reminded, at this point, that Wikipedia
determines what is Science, by counting the number of Google hits...
Don't you see the galactic misalignment in this? The Etherfolk of the
massless energy are beaming in from Deep Space Nine. You, on the other
hand, are clearly coming in from Babylon 5. There is no space time
continuum between these two, you edjeet!
DS9 in Star Trek domain:http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/DS9/
Babylon 5 is in the Warner Brothers Domain!http://babylon5.warnerbros.com/index2.html
- All Bad
303
2008-07-22 00:44:21 UTC
Permalink
http://www.aetherometry.com/Electronic_Publications/Politics_of_Science/Antiwikipedia/awp_index.html
Loading...