First Amendment line appears to have been crossed

NUR

2010-12-03 01:37:20 UTC

Post by Freedom of Conscience
7th Cir: Public online 08-2306 case documents as PDF and oral argument MP3
"When a district judge takes sides in a religious schism, purports to decide matters of spiritual succession, and
excludes dissenters from using the name, symbols, and marks of the faith (as distinct from the name and marks of a
church) [boldface added], the First Amendment line appears to have been crossed."
http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/fdocs/docs.fwx?caseno=08-2306&submit=show...um=2306
Chicago Tribune. Baha'i rift. Baha'is upset with Orthodox Baha'i Faithhttp://articles.chicagotribune.com/2009-05-18/news/0905170216_1_ortho...
Comments posted to The Chicago Tribune Forum on one page:http://www.fglaysher.com/bahaicensorship/Chicago_Tribune.html
Baha'i Faith & Religious Freedom of Consciencehttp://www.fglaysher.com/bahaicensorship

Surely in the late 1960s someone amongst the entourage of Remey with
some legal expertise would've known this? Why then didn't they do
something about that decision back then that it's taken this long to
address the blatantly obvious?