SUSAN STILES MANECK'S UNEQUIVOCAL ADMISSION TO ORCHESTRATED FRAUD

[Sock-Puppet'ullah]

http://groups.google.com.au/group/talk.religion.bahai/browse_frm/thread/1491f8f197223208/43af3c9641255381?lnk=gst&q=YooHoo+palu&rnum=1


Newsgroups: talk.religion.bahai
From: ***@jam.rr.com
Date: 25 Oct 2005 16:40:23 -0700
Local: Wed, Oct 26 2005 9:40 am
Subject: Re: YooHoo palu!

You should have been Bill Pleasant. After all, if you are going to
make a sucker out of Nima Hazini you might as well make money at it.

[Sock-Puppet'ullah]

http://groups.google.com.au/group/talk.religion.bahai/browse_frm/thread/1491f8f197223208/43af3c9641255381?lnk=gst&q=YooHoo+palu&rnum=1
"You should have been Bill Pleasant. After all, if you are going to
make a sucker out of Nima Hazini you might as well make money at it."

-
From: "Yamacraw Press" <***@lycos.com> Add to Address Book
To: "Nima Hazini" <***@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 23:39:27 -0500
Subject: We will triumph

I am really sick, effendi.

I think somebody poisoned me.

There is blood coming out of my ass, man.

I will go to my father's old doctor in the morning and get straight.

It is heavy metal poisoning. (Probably mercury). I feel weak and
nauseous. Since this morning, I have been puking and crapping blood. I
believe that the poison was in a cup of tea I drank in Beaufort on
Sunday.

Who did it? I suspect the CIA, not the AO.

Just put it this way, bro., it is very hard to kill niggers.

We will triumph.

I believe I was poisoned in Beaufort, SC on Sunday afternoon when we
had the event at my father's grave at the foot of the National
Cemetary.

They cannot kill me, Nima. They tried, and I am suffereing right now.
But my suffering is momentary. But I must be honest and say that I
have never been so sick before. My hands and neck are swollen. My
figers are stiff. But I will be better tomorrow.

This is not the first time that the enemy has tried to kill me.

Tomorrow, I will be strong again.

--Bill

[Sock-Puppet'ullah]

*SUSAN MANECK'S FABRICATED NEWS STORY
http://groups.google.com.au/group/talk.religion.bahai/browse_frm/thread/d53666a71a8d0fc1/08372fb41c860117#08372fb41c860117
Written by Hindustan Times
Sunday, 20 August 2006

THE DELHI High Court on Friday stayed the arrest of eight management
committee members of Lotus Temple, the famed Bahai shrine, charged
with indulging in anti-national activities.

Justice A.K. Sikri stayed the arrest on a petition, which claimed that
the prosecuting agencies had so far failed to establish even an iota
of evidence to prove the charges. Senior counsel K. Sood, appearing
for the petitioners, submitted that the investigating agencies -
including the CBI and Delhi government - had found no substance in
the allegations levelled against the management by a section of the
sacked
employees.

<ed - this story above is completely bogus and was never run by the
Hindustan Times>.
--

Official statement of the Hindustan Times regarding the story falsely
attributed to it by Susan Maneck:

From: "Hindustan Times" <XXXXXXXXX> Add to Address Book
To: "Wahid Azal" <***@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 10 September 2006 20:29:26 -0500
Subject: Re: Story attributed to Hindustan Times

<snip>

We can confirm that the item submitted in your email was not one
published by the Hindustan Times or any other publication we are aware
of.

Thank you for your query.

-

[Máirseáil Rí Laoise]

Post by Sock-Puppet'ullah
*SUSAN MANECK'S FABRICATED NEWS STORY
http://groups.google.com.au/group/talk.religion.bahai/browse_frm/thread/d53666a71a8d0fc1/08372fb41c860117#08372fb41c860117
Written by Hindustan Times
Sunday, 20 August 2006
THE DELHI High Court on Friday stayed the arrest of eight management
committee members of Lotus Temple, the famed Bahai shrine, charged
with indulging in anti-national activities.
Justice A.K. Sikri stayed the arrest on a petition, which claimed that
the prosecuting agencies had so far failed to establish even an iota
of evidence to prove the charges. Senior counsel K. Sood, appearing
for the petitioners, submitted that the investigating agencies -
including the CBI and Delhi government - had found no substance in
the allegations levelled against the management by a section of the
sacked
employees.
<ed - this story above is completely bogus and was never run by the
Hindustan Times>.
--
Official statement of the Hindustan Times regarding the story falsely
From: "Hindustan Times" <XXXXXXXXX> Add to Address Book
Date: Sun, 10 September 2006 20:29:26 -0500
Subject: Re: Story attributed to Hindustan Times
<snip>
We can confirm that the item submitted in your email was not one
published by the Hindustan Times or any other publication we are aware
of.
Thank you for your query.

Very interesting ... but could we see the email you sent and have it
authenticated by a reliable witness?

Post by Sock-Puppet'ullah
-

[Sock-Puppet'ullah]

On Aug 4, 8:50 am, "Máirseáil Rí Laoise"

Post by Máirseáil Rí Laoise
Very interesting ... but could we see the email you sent and have it
authenticated by a reliable witness?

No problem, have your attorneys contact me, and we'll happily furnish
you with that information. But before we comply, first please furnish
us with a reliable link and verifiable archive for the Hindustan Times
story Susan Maniac submitted here claiming to have been published by
them - which wasn't.

W

[Viv]

Post by Sock-Puppet'ullah
On Aug 4, 8:50 am, "Máirseáil Rí Laoise"

Post by Máirseáil Rí Laoise
Very interesting ... but could we see the email you sent and have it
authenticated by a reliable witness?

No problem, have your attorneys contact me, and we'll happily furnish
you with that information.

Typical Nima - assertion but no evidence. Allegation then retreat.

V.

[All Bad]

Post by Sock-Puppet'ullah
On Aug 4, 8:50 am, "Máirseáil Rí Laoise"

Post by Máirseáil Rí Laoise
Very interesting ... but could we see the email you sent and have it
authenticated by a reliable witness?

No problem, have your attorneys contact me, and we'll happily furnish
you with that information.

VJ: Typical Nima - assertion but no evidence. Allegation then retreat.

He's back; God is in Heaven and all is right with TRB, again.

- All Bad

[Sock-Puppet'ullah]

Post by Viv
Typical Nima - assertion but no evidence. Allegation then retreat.

Au contraire, palu. The assertion was made you. You asserted the
letter the editor of the Hindustan Times sent me was fraudulent.
Dermod jumped in behind your behind and asked for verifiability. I am
happy to comply so long as 1) a verifiable link and 2) traceable
archive of the bogus story Susan Maniac submitted (and attributed to
the Hindustant Times) be given. Give me these two, and I will give you
the full headers for the letter I received from the Hindustan Times.

The assertion and retreat (read: fraud) was actually perpetrated by
your lot, specifically Susan Maniac. If the story she submitted here
to TRB was actually *real*, you so-and-sos would have been ramming its
link down all our throats. The conspicuous misdirection of you
criminal fraudsters and interpolators and utter refusal to provide a
simple verifiable link and archive to the story you gave says
everything about the actual story, and that the espionage case in
India is still ongoing.

Prove me wrong -- if you can.

W

[Máirseáil Rí Laoise]

"Sock-Puppet'ullah" <***@gmail.com> wrote in message news:ececabb6-5f49-474c-9a8d-***@a3g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 4, 8:50 am, "Máirseáil Rí Laoise"

Post by Máirseáil Rí Laoise
Very interesting ... but could we see the email you sent and have it
authenticated by a reliable witness?

SP. No problem, have your attorneys contact me, and we'll happily furnish
you with that information.

MRL You gotta be joking ... I save my attorneys for worthwhile opposition


SP But before we comply, first please furnish
us with a reliable link and verifiable archive for the Hindustan Times
story Susan Maniac submitted here claiming to have been published by
them - which wasn't.

MRL Suit yourself ducky ... I'm really not that interested.

[بسم الله القديم الأزلي المحيط الذي أحاط بعلمه جميع مخلوقاته القديم الأبدي الذي لا ابتداء لقدمه وليس له انتهاء]

On Aug 14, 7:57 am, "Máirseáil Rí Laoise"

Post by Máirseáil Rí Laoise
MRL Suit yourself ducky ... I'm really not that interested.

A frank admission that no such archive or link to the story submitted
by Susan Maniac exists, proving that item she put up as a fraud and a
hoax, just as I suspected and the editors of the Hindustan Times
stated, proving the Indian case is ongoing.

CAUTION NON-BAHAIS

See *Bahais In My Backyard*
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2877478116441126906&hl=en-AU
BAHAIM Tactics & Techniques
"Slanderous Vilification" = The Baha'i Technique - Ad Hominem, Libel,
Slander, Demonize, Scapegoat, Ostracize, Shun, Banish, Backbite,
Defame, Vilify, Discredit, Smear, Revile, Suppress, Attack, Bully,
Intimidate, Threaten, Malign, Blackball, Deceive, Coerce, Silence,
Harass... etc., etc.... CAUTION NON-BAHAIS
1. As far as possible they hold back from responding
2. Then they claim no knowledge [of the given issue] by feigning
ignorance
3. After the exposer has exposed they will try to divert to secondary
and totally peripheral and irrelevent side-issues
4. The exposer is then painted as someone with an axe to grind,
biased, deluded (while they, the bahaim, still have not responded to
the main issue exposed)
5. Next they relate mental instability and insanity to the exposer
[i.e. shoot the messenger]
6. Then, the last tactic, is to wheel out several dubious personas on
the scene who claim to be neutral non-bahai observers who then begin
attacking the exposer as well as the issue exposed and supporting the
bahais and their issues as so-called non-bahais

[PaulHammond]

On 14 Aug, 04:34, بسم الله القديم الأزلي المحيط الذي أحاط بعلمه جميع
مخلوقاته القديم الأبدي الذي لا ابتداء لقدمه وليس له انتهاء

Post by بسم الله القديم الأزلي المحيط الذي أحاط بعلمه جميع مخلوقاته القديم الأبدي الذي لا ابتداء لقدمه وليس له انتهاء
On Aug 14, 7:57 am, "Máirseáil Rí Laoise"

Post by Máirseáil Rí Laoise
MRL Suit yourself ducky ... I'm really not that interested.

A frank admission that no such archive or link to the story submitted
by Susan Maniac exists, proving that item she put up as a fraud and a
hoax, just as I suspected and the editors of the Hindustan Times
stated, proving the Indian case is ongoing.

The [hrase "frank admission" sits in the same portion of your deluded
brain as "irrefutable proof" for you, doens't it?

The stronger the adjectives, the weaker your case. That's normal for
you, isn't it.

How do you go from "I'm not really interested in wasting my time
trying to track down this article" to "I admit that I know for a fact
that it never existed"?

Only in Nima's mouse-powered brain is such a travesty possible!

Paul

[Máirseáil Rí Laoise]

"??? ???? ?????? ?????? ?????? ???? ???? ????? ???? ???????? ?????? ??????
???? ?? ?????? ????? ???? ?? ??????" <***@gmail.com> wrote in
message news:e223c247-316a-44a1-80a0-***@w24g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 14, 7:57 am, "Máirseáil Rí Laoise"

Post by Máirseáil Rí Laoise
MRL Suit yourself ducky ... I'm really not that interested.

SPA A frank admission that no such archive or link to the story submitted
by Susan Maniac exists, proving that item she put up as a fraud and a
hoax, just as I suspected and the editors of the Hindustan Times
stated, proving the Indian case is ongoing.


MRL Nothing of the sort! I'm not paid to defend Susie and have no interest
otherwise. Of course I'm open to offers ... though it better be a damn good
one. Defending Susie goes above and beyond what may reasonably be expected
from any semi-intelligent poster and I, as you can testify to from
experience, am a lot more than your average semi-intelligent poster and you
are a lot less than your average semi-intelligent poster .

.

[PaulHammond]

On 14 Aug, 04:34, بسم الله القديم الأزلي المحيط الذي أحاط بعلمه جميع
مخلوقاته القديم الأبدي الذي لا ابتداء لقدمه وليس له انتهاء

Post by بسم الله القديم الأزلي المحيط الذي أحاط بعلمه جميع مخلوقاته القديم الأبدي الذي لا ابتداء لقدمه وليس له انتهاء
On Aug 14, 7:57 am, "Máirseáil Rí Laoise"

Post by Máirseáil Rí Laoise
MRL Suit yourself ducky ... I'm really not that interested.

A frank admission that no such archive or link to the story submitted
by Susan Maniac exists, proving that item she put up as a fraud and a
hoax, just as I suspected and the editors of the Hindustan Times
stated, proving the Indian case is ongoing.

The "I'm not interested" of course refers to THIS ridiculous
suggestion by the brainless chickenhead:

"No problem, have your attorneys contact me, and we'll happily
furnish
you with that information. But before we comply, first please furnish
us with a reliable link and verifiable archive for the Hindustan
Times
story Susan Maniac submitted here claiming to have been published by
them - which wasn't. "

So - anyone who isn't willing to employ lawyers to deal with an
internet kook is "frankly admitting to knowledge of a forged story
posted by Susan Maneck 2 years ago".

What an incomprehensible loser!

[بسم الله القديم الأزلي المحيط الذي أحاط بعلمه جميع مخلوقاته القديم الأبدي الذي لا ابتداء لقدمه وليس له انتهاء]

A frank admission that no such archive or link to the story submitted
by Susan Maniac exists, proving that item she put up as a fraud and a
hoax, just as I suspected and the editors of the Hindustan Times
stated, proving the Indian case is ongoing.

CAUTION NON-BAHAIS

See *Bahais In My Backyard*
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2877478116441126906&hl=en-AU
BAHAIM Tactics & Techniques
"Slanderous Vilification" = The Baha'i Technique - Ad Hominem, Libel,
Slander, Demonize, Scapegoat, Ostracize, Shun, Banish, Backbite,
Defame, Vilify, Discredit, Smear, Revile, Suppress, Attack, Bully,
Intimidate, Threaten, Malign, Blackball, Deceive, Coerce, Silence,
Harass... etc., etc.... CAUTION NON-BAHAIS
1. As far as possible they hold back from responding
2. Then they claim no knowledge [of the given issue] by feigning
ignorance
3. After the exposer has exposed they will try to divert to secondary
and totally peripheral and irrelevent side-issues
4. The exposer is then painted as someone with an axe to grind,
biased, deluded (while they, the bahaim, still have not responded to
the main issue exposed)
5. Next they relate mental instability and insanity to the exposer
[i.e. shoot the messenger]
6. Then, the last tactic, is to wheel out several dubious personas on
the scene who claim to be neutral non-bahai observers who then begin
attacking the exposer as well as the issue exposed and supporting the
bahais and their issues as so-called non-bahais