Proof that Sasan Pasabani/mash_ghasem is LYING and is a LIAR

[Death to Haifan Bahaism]

LIBER DECATRIARCHIA MYSTICA: Sketchings of the Thirteen Encompassing
Spheres of the Tree of Reality & Assorted Material (Library of the
Most Great Name: Eastern Coast, Australia, 2006), p.
26-27.
http://books.google.com.au/books?id=zzwwkCzNQzQC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Liber+Decatriarchia+Mystica&ei=_PiISdCgMYbokATewaW8BA#PPA26,M1


“…in Appendix B I demonstrate with solid textual sources the very
evidentiary historical proofs for the allegations I am making here
against Baha’ism. Nor am I one averse to polemic when it is rightfully
called for nor am I prepared to tone down my righteous invective
against such minions of the counter-initiation in order to compromise
the Truth in the name of political expediency. Others are welcome to
continue the charade - to their certain doom and inevitable peril -,
but that is not what I am about. I brook no compromises with the Lie
nor do I take any prisoners in my just war against it. My weapons here
are the Word and the Truth, and nothing else. Experience has proven
time and again that the Biblical Whore of Babylon cannot be coaxed or
persuaded into changing its long established pattern of unmitigated
pure evil. As James the Teacher of Righteousness and his partisans
did
in 66-67 CE, albeit unsuccessfully, one must storm the Temple in order
to reclaim it from the sullied hands of evil and so thereby expel
those usurpers illegitimately occupying it, forcefully pushing them
and their fellow-travelers out by the proverbial sword - going for the
jugular, as it were - thereby constraining them forever to heel for
the Good of All whilst the Truth sheds its Light erasing the shadowy
darkness that they are and have always been. Note that after I am
finished with Baha’ism, that is precisely what I also plan to do with
the Islamists as well, but obviously on a much, much grander scale,
and beginning with the mulláhs in Iran.”

[Death to Haifan Bahaism]

http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.culture.iranian/browse_thread/thread/21121ec1778cd173#

Post by Death to Haifan Bahaism
LIBER DECATRIARCHIA MYSTICA: Sketchings of the Thirteen Encompassing
Spheres of the Tree of Reality & Assorted Material (Library of the
Most Great Name: Eastern Coast, Australia, 2006), p.
26-27.http://books.google.com.au/books?id=zzwwkCzNQzQC&printsec=frontcover&...
“…in Appendix B I demonstrate with solid textual sources the very
evidentiary historical proofs for the allegations I am making here
against Baha’ism. Nor am I one averse to polemic when it is rightfully
called for nor am I prepared to tone down my righteous invective
against such minions of the counter-initiation in order to compromise
the Truth in the name of political expediency. Others are welcome to
continue the charade - to their certain doom and inevitable peril -,
but that is not what I am about. I brook no compromises with the Lie
nor do I take any prisoners in my just war against it. My weapons here
are the Word and the Truth, and nothing else. Experience has proven
time and again that the Biblical Whore of Babylon cannot be coaxed or
persuaded into changing its long established pattern of unmitigated
pure evil. As James the Teacher of Righteousness and his partisans
did
in 66-67 CE, albeit unsuccessfully, one must storm the Temple in order
to reclaim it from the sullied hands of evil and so thereby expel
those usurpers illegitimately occupying it, forcefully pushing them
and their fellow-travelers out by the proverbial sword - going for the
jugular, as it were - thereby constraining them forever to heel for
the Good of All whilst the Truth sheds its Light erasing the shadowy
darkness that they are and have always been. Note that after I am
finished with Baha’ism, that is precisely what I also plan to do with
the Islamists as well, but obviously on a much, much grander scale,
and beginning with the mulláhs in Iran.”

[mash_ghasem]

I stand corrected. I am not a paid agent to log my activities in the
USENET GROUPS. Yet another proof that this IRI agent is keeping track
of people's activity in the newsgroups but he is too stupid to reveal
it as Paul said, "to score a cheap debating point". To everyone , be
very careful with this guy and your personal info.

Post by Death to Haifan Bahaism
LIBER DECATRIARCHIA MYSTICA: Sketchings of the Thirteen Encompassing
Spheres of the Tree of Reality & Assorted Material (Library of the
Most Great Name: Eastern Coast, Australia, 2006), p.
26-27.http://books.google.com.au/books?id=zzwwkCzNQzQC&printsec=frontcover&...
“…in Appendix B I demonstrate with solid textual sources the very
evidentiary historical proofs for the allegations I am making here
against Baha’ism. Nor am I one averse to polemic when it is rightfully
called for nor am I prepared to tone down my righteous invective
against such minions of the counter-initiation in order to compromise
the Truth in the name of political expediency. Others are welcome to
continue the charade - to their certain doom and inevitable peril -,
but that is not what I am about. I brook no compromises with the Lie
nor do I take any prisoners in my just war against it. My weapons here
are the Word and the Truth, and nothing else. Experience has proven
time and again that the Biblical Whore of Babylon cannot be coaxed or
persuaded into changing its long established pattern of unmitigated
pure evil. As James the Teacher of Righteousness and his partisans
did
in 66-67 CE, albeit unsuccessfully, one must storm the Temple in order
to reclaim it from the sullied hands of evil and so thereby expel
those usurpers illegitimately occupying it, forcefully pushing them
and their fellow-travelers out by the proverbial sword - going for the
jugular, as it were - thereby constraining them forever to heel for
the Good of All whilst the Truth sheds its Light erasing the shadowy
darkness that they are and have always been. Note that after I am
finished with Baha’ism, that is precisely what I also plan to do with
the Islamists as well, but obviously on a much, much grander scale,
and beginning with the mulláhs in Iran.”

[Ruhaniya]

I stand corrected. I am not a paid agent  to log my activities in the
USENET GROUPS.

Bullshit! Here is the proof,
http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.culture.iranian/browse_thread/thread/21121ec1778cd173#


LIBER DECATRIARCHIA MYSTICA: Sketchings of the Thirteen Encompassing
Spheres of the Tree of Reality & Assorted Material (Library of the
Most Great Name: Eastern Coast, Australia, 2006), p.
26-27.
http://books.google.com.au/books?id=zzwwkCzNQzQC&printsec=frontcover&...

“…in Appendix B I demonstrate with solid textual sources the very
evidentiary historical proofs for the allegations I am making here
against Baha’ism. Nor am I one averse to polemic when it is
rightfully
called for nor am I prepared to tone down my righteous invective
against such minions of the counter-initiation in order to compromise
the Truth in the name of political expediency. Others are welcome to
continue the charade - to their certain doom and inevitable peril -,
but that is not what I am about. I brook no compromises with the Lie
nor do I take any prisoners in my just war against it. My weapons
here
are the Word and the Truth, and nothing else. Experience has proven
time and again that the Biblical Whore of Babylon cannot be coaxed or
persuaded into changing its long established pattern of unmitigated
pure evil. As James the Teacher of Righteousness and his partisans
did
in 66-67 CE, albeit unsuccessfully, one must storm the Temple in
order
to reclaim it from the sullied hands of evil and so thereby expel
those usurpers illegitimately occupying it, forcefully pushing them
and their fellow-travelers out by the proverbial sword - going for
the
jugular, as it were - thereby constraining them forever to heel for
the Good of All whilst the Truth sheds its Light erasing the shadowy
darkness that they are and have always been. Note that after I am
finished with Baha’ism, that is precisely what I also plan to do with
the Islamists as well, but obviously on a much, much grander scale,
and beginning with the mulláhs in Iran.”

[PaulHammond]

I don't see how continually reposting a section of your own book is
meant to prove anything about mash ghasem.

Post by Ruhaniya

I stand corrected. I am not a paid agent  to log my activities in the
USENET GROUPS.

Bullshit! Here is the proof,
http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.culture.iranian/browse_thread/thread/21121ec1778cd173#
LIBER DECATRIARCHIA MYSTICA: Sketchings of the Thirteen Encompassing
Spheres of the Tree of Reality & Assorted Material (Library of the
Most Great Name: Eastern Coast, Australia, 2006), p.
26-27.
http://books.google.com.au/books?id=zzwwkCzNQzQC&printsec=frontcover&...
“…in Appendix B I demonstrate with solid textual sources the very
evidentiary historical proofs for the allegations I am making here
against Baha’ism. Nor am I one averse to polemic when it is
rightfully
called for nor am I prepared to tone down my righteous invective
against such minions of the counter-initiation in order to compromise
the Truth in the name of political expediency. Others are welcome to
continue the charade - to their certain doom and inevitable peril -,
but that is not what I am about. I brook no compromises with the Lie
nor do I take any prisoners in my just war against it. My weapons here
are the Word and the Truth, and nothing else. Experience has proven
time and again that the Biblical Whore of Babylon cannot be coaxed or
persuaded into changing its long established pattern of unmitigated
pure evil. As James the Teacher of Righteousness and his partisans
did
in 66-67 CE, albeit unsuccessfully, one must storm the Temple in order
to reclaim it from the sullied hands of evil and so thereby expel
those usurpers illegitimately occupying it, forcefully pushing them
and their fellow-travelers out by the proverbial sword - going for the
jugular, as it were - thereby constraining them forever to heel for
the Good of All whilst the Truth sheds its Light erasing the shadowy
darkness that they are and have always been. Note that after I am
finished with Baha’ism, that is precisely what I also plan to do with
the Islamists as well, but obviously on a much, much grander scale,
and beginning with the mulláhs in Iran.”

[mash_ghasem]

:-) Paul I know you are a sharp guy and don't miss a point but here
is what happen.

1. Nimo asked me if knew a Bloomgerg guy.
2. I said No.
3. He dug up my 2 years old post exchange with a Bahai basher which I
don't remember and now is calling me a lier :-)


THE BIG PICTURE. He is a paid IRI agent logging and keeping track of
people's activity in the USENET and he is too stupid to cover his ass.
I told you guys he is an IRI agent and I even have more proof that he
is a sell out, but take this one as an example.

Post by PaulHammond
I don't see how continually reposting a section of your own book is
meant to prove anything about mash ghasem.

Post by Ruhaniya

I stand corrected. I am not a paid agent  to log my activities in the
USENET GROUPS.

Bullshit! Here is the proof,
http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.culture.iranian/browse_thread/t...
LIBER DECATRIARCHIA MYSTICA: Sketchings of the Thirteen Encompassing
Spheres of the Tree of Reality & Assorted Material (Library of the
Most Great Name: Eastern Coast, Australia, 2006), p.
26-27.
http://books.google.com.au/books?id=zzwwkCzNQzQC&printsec=frontcover&...
“…in Appendix B I demonstrate with solid textual sources the very
evidentiary historical proofs for the allegations I am making here
against Baha’ism. Nor am I one averse to polemic when it is rightfully
called for nor am I prepared to tone down my righteous invective
against such minions of the counter-initiation in order to compromise
the Truth in the name of political expediency. Others are welcome to
continue the charade - to their certain doom and inevitable peril -,
but that is not what I am about. I brook no compromises with the Lie
nor do I take any prisoners in my just war against it. My weapons here
are the Word and the Truth, and nothing else. Experience has proven
time and again that the Biblical Whore of Babylon cannot be coaxed or
persuaded into changing its long established pattern of unmitigated
pure evil. As James the Teacher of Righteousness and his partisans
did
in 66-67 CE, albeit unsuccessfully, one must storm the Temple in order
to reclaim it from the sullied hands of evil and so thereby expel
those usurpers illegitimately occupying it, forcefully pushing them
and their fellow-travelers out by the proverbial sword - going for the
jugular, as it were - thereby constraining them forever to heel for
the Good of All whilst the Truth sheds its Light erasing the shadowy
darkness that they are and have always been. Note that after I am
finished with Baha’ism, that is precisely what I also plan to do with
the Islamists as well, but obviously on a much, much grander scale,
and beginning with the mulláhs in Iran.”- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

[Ruhaniya]

 :-) Paul I know you are a sharp guy and don't miss a point but here
is what happen.

You are a liar and here is the proof,
http://groups.google.com.au/group/soc.culture.iranian/browse_thread/thread/21121ec1778cd173#
LIBER DECATRIARCHIA MYSTICA: Sketchings of the Thirteen Encompassing
Spheres of the Tree of Reality & Assorted Material (Library of the
Most Great Name: Eastern Coast, Australia, 2006), p.
26-27.
http://books.google.com.au/books?id=zzwwkCzNQzQC&printsec=frontcover&...


“…in Appendix B I demonstrate with solid textual sources the very
evidentiary historical proofs for the allegations I am making here
against Baha’ism. Nor am I one averse to polemic when it is
rightfully
called for nor am I prepared to tone down my righteous invective
against such minions of the counter-initiation in order to compromise
the Truth in the name of political expediency. Others are welcome to
continue the charade - to their certain doom and inevitable peril -,
but that is not what I am about. I brook no compromises with the Lie
nor do I take any prisoners in my just war against it. My weapons
here
are the Word and the Truth, and nothing else. Experience has proven
time and again that the Biblical Whore of Babylon cannot be coaxed or
persuaded into changing its long established pattern of unmitigated
pure evil. As James the Teacher of Righteousness and his partisans
did
in 66-67 CE, albeit unsuccessfully, one must storm the Temple in
order
to reclaim it from the sullied hands of evil and so thereby expel
those usurpers illegitimately occupying it, forcefully pushing them
and their fellow-travelers out by the proverbial sword - going for
the
jugular, as it were - thereby constraining them forever to heel for
the Good of All whilst the Truth sheds its Light erasing the shadowy
darkness that they are and have always been. Note that after I am
finished with Baha’ism, that is precisely what I also plan to do with
the Islamists as well, but obviously on a much, much grander scale,
and beginning with the mulláhs in Iran.”

[Ruhaniya]

On Feb 20, 9:46 am, PaulHammond <***@onetel.net.uk> wrote:

"First, I do believe, based on Hammond's refusal to say why he is
interested in the Baha'i Faith and his frequent defense of the AO,
that he is probably working for them."

-- Eric Stetson, September 2003

Post by PaulHammond
I don't see how continually reposting a section of your own book is
meant to prove anything about mash ghasem.

You don't see. Period! You only see what you are told to. If the
allegation is that I am an agent of the IRI, then you and your
pathetic servile lackey need to explain how it becomes that I have in
print declared war on the IRI as well as the cult you serve. Do you
see now, limey ponce?

LIBER DECATRIARCHIA MYSTICA: Sketchings of the Thirteen Encompassing
Spheres of the Tree of Reality & Assorted Material (Library of the
Most Great Name: Eastern Coast, Australia, 2006), p.
26-27.
http://books.google.com.au/books?id=zzwwkCzNQzQC&printsec=frontcover&...


“…in Appendix B I demonstrate with solid textual sources the very
evidentiary historical proofs for the allegations I am making here
against Baha’ism. Nor am I one averse to polemic when it is
rightfully
called for nor am I prepared to tone down my righteous invective
against such minions of the counter-initiation in order to compromise
the Truth in the name of political expediency. Others are welcome to
continue the charade - to their certain doom and inevitable peril -,
but that is not what I am about. I brook no compromises with the Lie
nor do I take any prisoners in my just war against it. My weapons
here
are the Word and the Truth, and nothing else. Experience has proven
time and again that the Biblical Whore of Babylon cannot be coaxed or
persuaded into changing its long established pattern of unmitigated
pure evil. As James the Teacher of Righteousness and his partisans
did
in 66-67 CE, albeit unsuccessfully, one must storm the Temple in
order
to reclaim it from the sullied hands of evil and so thereby expel
those usurpers illegitimately occupying it, forcefully pushing them
and their fellow-travelers out by the proverbial sword - going for
the
jugular, as it were - thereby constraining them forever to heel for
the Good of All whilst the Truth sheds its Light erasing the shadowy
darkness that they are and have always been. Note that after I am
finished with Baha’ism, that is precisely what I also plan to do with
the Islamists as well, but obviously on a much, much grander scale,
and beginning with the mulláhs in Iran.”

[Ruhaniya]

Post by Ruhaniya

Post by PaulHammond
I don't see how continually reposting a section of your own book

BTW palu it occurs to me. You had earlier claimed vociferously that I
had never published anything. Care to explain how it is that not only
do I have a publication, but that my *Liber Decatriarchia Mystica* has
been cited by one of the most eminent literary theorists and
postmodern novelists in the anglophone world:
http://books.google.com.au/books?id=kw3eahkYar8C&pg=PA167&dq=Wahid+Azal&ei=kh-eSaSgMI_GlQSN0JnmCQ

as well as being favourably cited and discussed in a post-graduate
dissertation by Robert Galloway at the University of Illinois?

W

Post by Ruhaniya
"First, I do believe, based on Hammond's refusal to say why he is
interested in the Baha'i Faith and his frequent defense of the AO,
that he is probably working for them."
-- Eric Stetson, September 2003

Post by PaulHammond
I don't see how continually reposting a section of your own book is
meant to prove anything about mash ghasem.

You don't see. Period! You only see what you are told to. If the
allegation is that I am an agent of the IRI, then you and your
pathetic servile lackey need to explain how it becomes that I have in
print declared war on the IRI as well as the cult you serve. Do you
see now, limey ponce?
LIBER DECATRIARCHIA MYSTICA: Sketchings of the Thirteen Encompassing
Spheres of the Tree of Reality & Assorted Material (Library of the
Most Great Name: Eastern Coast, Australia, 2006), p.
26-27.http://books.google.com.au/books?id=zzwwkCzNQzQC&printsec=frontcover&...
“…in Appendix B I demonstrate with solid textual sources the very
evidentiary historical proofs for the allegations I am making here
against Baha’ism. Nor am I one averse to polemic when it is
rightfully
called for nor am I prepared to tone down my righteous invective
against such minions of the counter-initiation in order to compromise
the Truth in the name of political expediency. Others are welcome to
continue the charade - to their certain doom and inevitable peril -,
but that is not what I am about. I brook no compromises with the Lie
nor do I take any prisoners in my just war against it. My weapons here
are the Word and the Truth, and nothing else. Experience has proven
time and again that the Biblical Whore of Babylon cannot be coaxed or
persuaded into changing its long established pattern of unmitigated
pure evil. As James the Teacher of Righteousness and his partisans
did
in 66-67 CE, albeit unsuccessfully, one must storm the Temple in order
to reclaim it from the sullied hands of evil and so thereby expel
those usurpers illegitimately occupying it, forcefully pushing them
and their fellow-travelers out by the proverbial sword - going for the
jugular, as it were - thereby constraining them forever to heel for
the Good of All whilst the Truth sheds its Light erasing the shadowy
darkness that they are and have always been. Note that after I am
finished with Baha’ism, that is precisely what I also plan to do with
the Islamists as well, but obviously on a much, much grander scale,
and beginning with the mulláhs in Iran.”

[p***@onetel.net.uk]

Post by Ruhaniya

Post by PaulHammond
I don't see how continually reposting a section of your own book

BTW palu it occurs to me. You had earlier claimed vociferously that I
had never published anything.

Because your book only appears on a vanity website. I don't call that
"publishing".

So this IS an appendix from your book then?


Care to explain how it is that not only

Post by Ruhaniya
do I have a publication, but that my *Liber Decatriarchia Mystica* has
been cited by one of the most eminent literary theorists and
postmodern novelists in the anglophone world:http://books.google.com.au/books?id=kw3eahkYar8C&pg=PA167&dq=Wahid+Az...
as well as being favourably cited and discussed in a post-graduate
dissertation by Robert Galloway at the University of Illinois?
W

[All Bad]

Don't forget his two reviews of Starr's book. Is that double credits for
him as a literary critic, as well?

On "Tahirih TheAlogy:Female Cosmic Christ Spirit of the Age" W. wrote in
January of 2005, "If ecstatic Sufism met Wicca, this is what Izzitrip has
truly begun laying the groundwork for in her book."

Then in Auguest of that year he wrote of that exact same book, "your book is
literary garbage squared,"
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.religion.bahai/msg/1e49246d501885d2

Did it take him all those months to read the book? This is clearly another
case of W saying what he considers to be politically expedient at the moment
(ie lie through his cheeks).

W, only you could take yourself seriously for very long, and you take
ayahuasca to do that. BTW, did you know that ayahuasca is illegal in Oz?

- All Bad

Post by p***@onetel.net.uk

Post by Ruhaniya

Post by PaulHammond
I don't see how continually reposting a section of your own book

BTW palu it occurs to me. You had earlier claimed vociferously that I
had never published anything.

Because your book only appears on a vanity website. I don't call that
"publishing".
So this IS an appendix from your book then?
Care to explain how it is that not only

Post by Ruhaniya
do I have a publication, but that my *Liber Decatriarchia Mystica* has
been cited by one of the most eminent literary theorists and
postmodern novelists in the anglophone
world:http://books.google.com.au/books?id=kw3eahkYar8C&pg=PA167&dq=Wahid+Az...
as well as being favourably cited and discussed in a post-graduate
dissertation by Robert Galloway at the University of Illinois?
W

[m***@gmail.com]

Post by Ruhaniya

Post by PaulHammond
I don't see how continually reposting a section of your own book

BTW palu it occurs to me. You had earlier claimed vociferously that I
had never published anything.

Because your book only appears on a vanity website.  I don't call that
"publishing".

And I suppose you call 'academic' publications on the Baha'i faith,
originating almost exclusively from Baha'i operated publishing houses,
'publishing'?

So this IS an appendix from your book then?
Care to explain how it is that not only

Post by Ruhaniya
do I have a publication, but that my *Liber Decatriarchia Mystica* has
been cited by one of the most eminent literary theorists and
postmodern novelists in the anglophone world:http://books.google.com.au/books?id=kw3eahkYar8C&pg=PA167&dq=Wahid+Az...
as well as being favourably cited and discussed in a post-graduate
dissertation by Robert Galloway at the University of Illinois?
W

[All Bad]

Post by Ruhaniya

Post by PaulHammond
I don't see how continually reposting a section of your own book

BTW palu it occurs to me. You had earlier claimed vociferously that I
had never published anything.

Because your book only appears on a vanity website. I don't call that
"publishing".

MIA1: And I suppose you call 'academic' publications on the Baha'i faith,
originating almost exclusively from Baha'i operated publishing houses,
'publishing'?

AB: Go right ahead and suppose. Nima's vanity publishing got played out
right here on TRB. He denied that he was paying William Pleasant to publish
his book and then he came back here howling about how William Pleasant
ripped him off. No one who has been here a few years will be distracted by
your irrelevant handwaves.
AB: Bill says he is paying Nima, a statement that Nima, much later, labled
a lie
"Nima Hazini paid me "zip" to publish his book. I paid Nima Hazini for
the privilege to produce and market his first book. It was a privilege."
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.religion.bahai/msg/48e31ca4c7c23410

AB: This is a follow-up message from Nima where he glosses over the
statement about who is paying for publishing
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.religion.bahai/msg/1a13f0d0ad66e0b5
AB: He does not clarify that he is paying money to Pleasant when Pleasant
is around, but when he is gone, then Nima howls for the money that Pleasant
told everyone Nima was not paying.

http://groups.google.com/group/talk.religion.bahai/msg/ea5e4a53d72173dc

AB: But you go ahead and trust Nima; he has not lied to you this hour, that
you are aware of.

- All Bad

So this IS an appendix from your book then?
Care to explain how it is that not only

Post by Ruhaniya
do I have a publication, but that my *Liber Decatriarchia Mystica* has
been cited by one of the most eminent literary theorists and
postmodern novelists in the anglophone
world:http://books.google.com.au/books?id=kw3eahkYar8C&pg=PA167&dq=Wahid+Az...
as well as being favourably cited and discussed in a post-graduate
dissertation by Robert Galloway at the University of Illinois?
W

[Ruhaniya]

On Feb 21, 11:48 pm, "All Bad" <***@md.metrocast.net>
wrote:


http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Pat_Kohli
Pat Kohli

Pat Kohli, or Patrick Kohli, is a member of the Haifan Baha'i Faith
[1]
who makes regular contributions to the USENET newsgroup
talk.religion.bahai[2]. He is a computer programmer who has worked on
software for various projects, including military systems.


Contents [hide]
1 Background
2 Articles and Resources
2.1 Related SourceWatch Articles
2.2 References
2.3 External Articles


Background


He "is a computer scientist assigned to 4.5.3.3. He works for PMA-231
as the Open Architecture (OA) IPT lead, in the OA/FORCEnet IPT of the
Network Centric Warfare IPT. Prior to this he worked at Saint Inigoes
for 4.5 and developed a prototype next generation flight data
recorder, using COTS components, to meet incident reporting,
maintenance and FOQA needs. Pat also supported the old PMA-282 which
did weapon control systems for guided missiles. Pat has an MS in
computer Information Systems from Florida Tech." [3]


"Pat Kohli, NCW Open Architecture Lead, demonstrated how the E-2/C-2
program office (PMA-231) iscontinuously evaluating and implementing
software modernization to facilitate transition of the existing E-2
operational flight program to an environment using commercially
available systems. Venlet said, "The Naval Aviation Enterprise has
embraced open architecture as a fundamental building block of weapon
system development from its very inception. Our government/industry
teams continue to leverage these open system strategies and concepts
in achieving reduction in overall development cycle times and
delivering increased system capabilities to the Fleet faster and
cheaper. The advantages of integrating open architecture designs and
contracting strategies are measurable and pronounced as is
substantiated by our E-2D Advanced Hawkeye and P-8 Multi-Mission
Aircraft development programs. The key to continued success will be
maintaining the close partnership with industry experts, as we
provide
the right capabilities, at the right time and right cost to the joint
warfighter."The E-2 Hawkeye team has been representing and directly
supporting Venlet's executive office - the aviation domain lead for
open architecture initiatives - since June 2004, because of its role
as a battle management command and control platform and a central
network communications node in aviation. E-2 Program Manager Capt.
Randy Mahrsaid, "Today's evolving E-2 open architecture model paves
the way for a more mature system to be used by the E-2D prior to it
taking its place in the fleet."[3]


Pat Kohli has maintained a consistent web presence since the late
1990s, particularly on USENET, addressing both external critics and
dissenters within the Haifan Baha'i Faith tradition to which he
belongs [5]. In 1998, he voted against the creation of the USENET
group, talk.religion.bahai, as an un-moderated discussion forum for
issues relating to the Baha'i faith [4]. Official discussion
regarding
the creation of this group may also be found at: [6]. He posts under
the handles Mr All Bad and All_Bad [5]


Articles and Resources
Related SourceWatch Articles
References
$B",(B Letter from Assistant Secretary, Kishan Manocha, on Behalf of
National Spiritual Assembly of the Baha'is of the United Kingdom [1],
dated October 8, 2002, Accessed 17 February, 2009.
$B",(B Discussion Archive of USENET group Talk.Religion.Baha'i, [2],
Accessed February 17, 2009
$B",(B 3.0 3.1 Drema Ballengee-Grunst, "Assistant SecNav visits NAVAIR T&E
laboratory", November 10, 2005.
$B",(B Record of votes cast regarding the creation of the USENET group,
talk.religion.bahai,[3], Accessed February 17, 2009.
$B",(B Excerpt from USENET group talk.religion.bahai,[4], Accessed
February
17, 2009.
[edit]External Articles


Retrieved from "http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Pat_Kohli"
Categories: United States | Religion | Military | War/peace

[PaulHammond]

Post by m***@gmail.com

Post by Ruhaniya

Post by PaulHammond
I don't see how continually reposting a section of your own book

BTW palu it occurs to me. You had earlier claimed vociferously that I
had never published anything.

Because your book only appears on a vanity website.  I don't call that
"publishing".

And I suppose you call 'academic' publications on the Baha'i faith,
originating almost exclusively from Baha'i operated publishing houses,
'publishing'?

If they appear only on website which allow anyone who thinks they have
a book inside them to pay for space, no I wouldn't.

And then, you've mentioned a whole class of publications here. I
certainly wouldn't say something like Cole's "Modernity and the
Millenium" was "not published", although that one WOULDN'T be
published by Baha'i Press, I should think.

But if you put them past me on a case by case basis, I suppose you
MIGHT find one or two Baha'i Press publications that are as slight and
unreadable and Nima's contribution to thought.

Of course, I couldn't begin to imagine why you'd need my approval to
make your own mind up about what constitutes a real book.

Paul

Post by m***@gmail.com

So this IS an appendix from your book then?
Care to explain how it is that not only

Post by Ruhaniya
do I have a publication, but that my *Liber Decatriarchia Mystica* has
been cited by one of the most eminent literary theorists and
postmodern novelists in the anglophone world:http://books.google.com.au/books?id=kw3eahkYar8C&pg=PA167&dq=Wahid+Az...
as well as being favourably cited and discussed in a post-graduate
dissertation by Robert Galloway at the University of Illinois?
W

[Ruhaniya]

On Feb 22, 6:24 am, PaulHammond <***@onetel.net.uk> wrote:

"First, I do believe, based on Hammond's refusal to say why he is
interested in the Baha'i Faith and his frequent defense of the AO,
that he is probably working for them."

-- Eric Stetson, September 2003


From
HOSTAGE TO KHOMEINI by Robert Dreyfuss (New Benjamin Franklin House:
New York, 1980) pp.117-118 (Pdf pages 73-74)

http://www.wlym.com/pdf/iclc/hostage.pdf


&


http://www.archive.org/details/HostageToKhomeini


...Today the Bahai cult is hated in Iran, and is considered correctly
to be an arm of the British Crown. During the destabilization of the
Shah in 1978, it was widely reported that in several instances the
Bahai cult secretly funded the Khomeini Shi’ite movement. In part, the
money would have flowed through the cult’s links to the same
international ‘human rights’ organizations, such as Amnesty
International, that originally sponsored the anti-Shah movement in
Iran. These movements also derive from the “one world” currents
associated with the Bahais since the early 1900s. (If any Iranians
have been misled on the question of the Bahais by the supposed
antipathy of Khomeini’s clique to the Bahais, it should be noted that
the Bahai cultists often deliberately encouraged anti-Bahai
activities
as camouflage)...

Also see pp. 115-116 (Pdf page 72)


About the author:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Dreyfuss

See also,
By Bill Clinton's old mentor, Carroll Quigley, THE ANGLO-AMERICAN
http://www.scribd.com/doc/431914/Carroll-Quigley-The-Anglo-American-Establishment

[m***@gmail.com]

Post by Ruhaniya

Post by PaulHammond
I don't see how continually reposting a section of your own book

BTW palu it occurs to me. You had earlier claimed vociferously that I
had never published anything.

Because your book only appears on a vanity website.  I don't call that
"publishing".

Perhaps you call this publishing?

http://iranscope.ghandchi.com/Anthology/Bahai/fundamentalism.htm

Baha'i fundamentalists with theocratic leanings have used several
strategies to overcome this separationist heritage in their
scriptures. They have suppressed Persian texts and ensured that such
anti-theocratic passages are not officially translated into English.
They attempt to bound this scriptural principle as pertaining to “a
particular stage” of the evolution of the faith, as in the Semple
encyclical cited above. The “stage theory” of Baha'i fundamentalists
allows all contradictions between scriptural principles or earlier
Baha'i practice and their own vision to be resolved through relegating
all contrary evidence to the status of “a past stage.” The stage
theory relativizes even basic Baha'i principles like the non-
intervention of religion in politics, rendering them amenable to
future change and even reversal, and raising the question of whether
the religion permanently stands for any principle at all. Another
strategy might be called an appeal to the “disease of language.” Many
nineteenth-century Arabic and Persian technical terms found in the
nineteenth-century Baha'i scriptures have changed in their meaning
profoundly under the impact of modernity, and can now be read
anachronistically to support theocracy (Cole 1998c:95-96).

So this IS an appendix from your book then?
Care to explain how it is that not only

Post by Ruhaniya
do I have a publication, but that my *Liber Decatriarchia Mystica* has
been cited by one of the most eminent literary theorists and
postmodern novelists in the anglophone world:http://books.google.com.au/books?id=kw3eahkYar8C&pg=PA167&dq=Wahid+Az...
as well as being favourably cited and discussed in a post-graduate
dissertation by Robert Galloway at the University of Illinois?
W

[Ruhaniya]

On Feb 21, 5:56 am, ***@onetel.net.uk wrote:

"First, I do believe, based on Hammond's refusal to say why he is
interested in the Baha'i Faith and his frequent defense of the AO,
that he is probably working for them."

-- Eric Stetson, September 2003

Post by p***@onetel.net.uk
Because your book only appears on a vanity website.

Good for you! And Lulu.com is not a mere vanity webiste, nor is
amazon.com, etc, who still display it. Yet it appears that the most
eminent postmodern novelist and literary theoriest of his age, Samuel
Thomas, couldn't give flying rat's behind about your notions of what
constitutes a valid publication, or what is a vanity site. On content,
he found value. Nor could University of Illinois phenomenologist
Robert Galloway. And besides, you're not in position to judge any
publication in this area, especially mine, seeing how you support a
vanity organization known as the Haifan Bahaim cult.

Post by p***@onetel.net.uk
 I don't call that
"publishing".

You're not anybody to call anything, anything. You're a paid hack and
misinformation liason connected with the British Labour Party and the
government(s) of Blair-Brown and the Haifan Bahaim cult. Your opinion
in this matter - as in others - means absolutely FUCK-ALL, nada!

W