Darrick Evenson versus Paul Hammond (paedophile)

[d***@gmail.com]

Long, long ago, I claimed that Paul Hammond was a Paedophile! Years
ago! And, of course, it turns out that HE IS!!!!

When will you stupid IGNORANT "BLIND" so-called Baha'is open up your
CLOSED MINDS, and see that you are DELUDED????

I wrote of Paul (after he had written that I wanted to have sex with
my mother, and that I should be gang-raped in jail by black men
because I didn't like Groids----poor blacks who hated whites and were
often violent against me when I did NOTHING but show them respect and
leave them alone---I wrote the following YEARS ago:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you Liberal Paul,

Under the Law of God under Moses, Jesus, and Muhammed, adulterers
(like Mormon women) and sodomites (like your own butt buddies) would
have been stoned, or, in the case of Muhammad's day, had their
throats
CUT.


That was the Will of God. I see nowhere that this will not be the
case
in the World Order of Baha'u'llah. The fee to the House of Justice
for
hearing the case is not the punishment, but the fine. It is up to the
Universal House of Justice to set the punishments.


Of course, if they have people like you on it, they'll be charging
small fines for men who bugger boys.
Darrick Evenson

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[PaulHammond]

Post by d***@gmail.com
Long, long ago, I claimed that Paul Hammond was a Paedophile! Years
ago! And, of course, it turns out that HE IS!!!!

I am NOT a 57 year old man.

So, I am NOT THIS 57 year old man who has been convicted of a crime in
a juristiction that happens to be in the same country that I live in.

Post by d***@gmail.com
When will you stupid IGNORANT "BLIND" so-called Baha'is open up your
CLOSED MINDS, and see that you are DELUDED????

Well, anyone who prefers the word of a lying twat like Nima, who has
admitted to trawling the net for any negative portrayals of any person
calling themselves Paul Hammond, and has just spent the last few weeks
that I am a poster calling himself "paul75" who lives in
Cambridgeshire to the truth is clearly delusional.

But, Darrick, I think that ship sailed on you a very long time ago.

Have you decided yet whether you're Mormon or Baha'i?

Or is racism a good enough religion for you?

Paul

Post by d***@gmail.com
I wrote of Paul (after he had written that I wanted to have sex with
my mother, and that I should be gang-raped in jail by black men
because I didn't like Groids----poor blacks who hated whites and were
often violent against me when I did NOTHING but show them respect and

Interesting that I wrote about your racism BEFORE going on to read
this paragraph. Truly, it is your distinguishing characteristic.

What a sad specimen of humanity you are! Hanging on Nima's coat-tails
in order to spread libel about someone you argued with on the internet
5 years ago.

Sad!

Post by d***@gmail.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you Liberal Paul,
Under the Law of God under Moses, Jesus, and Muhammed, adulterers
(like Mormon women) and sodomites (like your own butt buddies) would
have been stoned, or, in the case of Muhammad's day, had their
throats
CUT.
That was the Will of God. I see nowhere that this will not be the
case
in the World Order of Baha'u'llah. The fee to the House of Justice
for
hearing the case is not the punishment, but the fine. It is up to the
Universal House of Justice to set the punishments.
Of course, if they have people like you on it, they'll be charging
small fines for men who bugger boys.
Darrick Evenson
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[NUR]

On May 30, 5:18 pm, PaulHammond <***@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
"First, I do believe, based on Hammond's refusal to say why he is
interested in the Baha'i Faith and his frequent defense of the AO,
that he is probably working for them."

-- Eric Stetson, September 16, 2003

Post by PaulHammond
So, I am NOT THIS 57 year old man who has been convicted of a crime in
a juristiction that happens to be in the same country that I live in.

You have no proof that you are 37 years old, either. As I said before,
MIA and I have scoured every public database, archive and notary
throughout the UK looking to establish your indentity based on the
things you have said about yourself here and elsewhere, and we have
come up short on all fronts. There is no record for a Paul Hammond
being born in Britian in 1970 or 1971 (i.e. the year you claim you
were born). So either your real name is not Paul Hammond, in which
case you have lied about absolutely everything you have said about
yourself here, or there is every likliehood that you are indeed the
paedophile Paul Hammond. It is as simple as that.

In any case your chickens appear to have come home to roost, palu.

W

[p***@onetel.net.uk]

Post by NUR
"First, I do believe, based on Hammond's refusal to say why he is
interested in the Baha'i Faith and his frequent defense of the AO,
that he is probably working for them."
-- Eric Stetson, September 16, 2003

Eric retracted that statement.

Post by NUR

Post by PaulHammond
So, I am NOT THIS 57 year old man who has been convicted of a crime in
a juristiction that happens to be in the same country that I live in.

You have no proof that you are 37 years old, either.

Yeah I do, actually. It's called my birth certificate.

Post by NUR
As I said before,
MIA and I have scoured every public database, archive and notary
throughout the UK looking to establish your indentity based on the
things you have said about yourself here and elsewhere, and we have
come up short on all fronts. There is no record for a Paul Hammond
being born in Britian in 1970 or 1971 (i.e. the year you claim you
were born).

You haven't looked hard enough, then!

I think you probably have to pay some kind of subscription to look up
records at the british Record Office.


So either your real name is not Paul Hammond, in which

Post by NUR
case you have lied about absolutely everything you have said about
yourself here, or there is every likliehood that you are indeed the
paedophile Paul Hammond. It is as simple as that.
In any case your chickens appear to have come home to roost, palu.

What? Because you trawled the internet to find a convicted child-porn
user who HAPPENS to share my quite common name?

Have you discovered whether this 57 year old man has the middle name
Andrew? Have you explained why you now DON'T believe that I was at
Keele University from 1989-93, or that Naz Ghanea-Hercock was one of
my contemporaries there?

Or are you still working on your theory that I'm really 30 people
posting from Haifa but somehow routing their posts through a server in
Lincolnshire or whereever it was, when you posted my email headers
that time when I accidentally sent a post to your email address rather
than the group?

Which kockamemie theory are you going to go with today?

Here's a definition of defamation which I saved some while ago from
off a BBC website:

"Get your facts right. In English law YOU have to prove that what you
write is true, rather than the person you've targeted having to prove
that you're wrong. And proving things in court can be a very difficult
and costly process. "

[p***@onetel.net.uk]

Post by p***@onetel.net.uk

Post by NUR
"First, I do believe, based on Hammond's refusal to say why he is
interested in the Baha'i Faith and his frequent defense of the AO,
that he is probably working for them."
-- Eric Stetson, September 16, 2003

Eric retracted that statement.
So either your real name is not Paul Hammond, in which

Post by NUR
case you have lied about absolutely everything you have said about
yourself here, or there is every likliehood that you are indeed the
paedophile Paul Hammond. It is as simple as that.

Nima, tell me. What is May's real name and date of birth?

If you don't provide me with that information instantly, then clearly
any lie I wish to make up must in fact be true!

Logic truly is a stranger to you kooks, isn't it?

[m***@gmail.com]

Post by p***@onetel.net.uk

Post by NUR
"First, I do believe, based on Hammond's refusal to say why he is
interested in the Baha'i Faith and his frequent defense of the AO,
that he is probably working for them."
-- Eric Stetson, September 16, 2003

Eric retracted that statement.
So either your real name is not Paul Hammond, in which

Post by NUR
case you have lied about absolutely everything you have said about
yourself here, or there is every likliehood that you are indeed the
paedophile Paul Hammond. It is as simple as that.

Nima, tell me.  What is May's real name and date of birth?
If you don't provide me with that information instantly, then clearly
any lie I wish to make up must in fact be true!
Logic truly is a stranger to you kooks, isn't it?

I think someone's getting a little frustrated, hmmm Paul? Maybe you
should go watch some Buffy the Vampire Slayer, or one of your favorite
Dr Who episodes, and relax a little. It might help you work through
some of your own logic issues. Or maybe not.

[p***@onetel.net.uk]

Post by m***@gmail.com
I think someone's getting a little frustrated, hmmm Paul? Maybe you
should go watch some Buffy the Vampire Slayer, or one of your favorite
Dr Who episodes, and relax a little. It might help you work through
some of your own logic issues. Or maybe not.-

Indeed, May. It's rather annoying when someone accuses you of being a
kiddie-fiddler.

So, what WAS your name?

And why have you been absent from the boards so long? When Pat was
away for a couple of weeks, you accused him of being a war criminal -
so which major wars have you been starting while you've been away, hmm?

[All Bad]

Post by m***@gmail.com
I think someone's getting a little frustrated, hmmm Paul? Maybe you
should go watch some Buffy the Vampire Slayer, or one of your favorite
Dr Who episodes, and relax a little. It might help you work through
some of your own logic issues. Or maybe not.-

PH:Indeed, May. It's rather annoying when someone accuses you of being a
kiddie-fiddler.

PH: So, what WAS your name?

AB: Harriet Yvonne Pocrite?

PH: And why have you been absent from the boards so long? When Pat was
away for a couple of weeks, you accused him of being a war criminal -
so which major wars have you been starting while you've been away, hmm?

AB: That would be the one in Sri Lanka .... no, May is posting from the US
and that one was non-American.

AB: How about something in Afghanistan, or the Swat valley?

- All Bad

[Aor]

Pat Kohli - CAUTION (Baha'i Internet Agency hack)


See,
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Pat_kohli


PAT KOHLI LIES ABOUT HIS IDENTITY ON SOURCEWATCH
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=User:Owen

"Rod Wicks on Pat Kohli"
http://groups.google.com.au/group/talk.religion.bahai/browse_thread/thread/196a2f4f90604439/0c3f3e62eb881985?q=rod+wicks+on+kkkholi&lnk=ol&

-

[NUR]

On May 31, 10:47 am, ***@onetel.net.uk wrote:

"First, I do believe, based on Hammond's refusal to say why he is
interested in the Baha'i Faith and his frequent defense of the AO,
that he is probably working for them."

-- Eric Stetson, September 16, 2003

Nima, tell me.  What is May's real name and date of birth?

Her name is first: YOUR middle: WORST last: NIGHTMARE and her date of
birth is 06/06/66. Use the colloseum scene in Gladiator as your gauge
and think back long and hard. Maybe, then, you could figure out who
she is....

"Get your facts right. In English law YOU have to prove that what you write is true, >rather than the person you've targeted having to prove that you're wrong.

Well, I've proven Paul Hammond is a convicted paedophile. So game set
match to moi on this one!

Have you discovered whether this 57 year old man has the middle name
Andrew? Have you explained why you now DON'T believe that I was at
Keele University from 1989-93, or that Naz Ghanea-Hercock was one of
my contemporaries there?

And why should that matter? Since the trackrecord of your lies and
damn lies, beginning with the fact that you deny being a bahai, are
well documented, why is this remotely noteworthy? For all we know you
could be a seriel killer as well.

And proving things in court can be a very difficult and costly process. "

Which is why your threat is shallow, empty and completely meaningless.
You could never sue me in a British court, nor would you have cause to
do so. You'd have to come here to OZ , and to Queensland specifically
to do that, and you personally don't have that kind of money. The
Baha'i Internet Agency does, however, and if they tried to fund a case
through you, I'd have you and they by the short and curlies here in
one day flat because I rule the legal roost here and know the means to
crucify you based on your prior, well-established defamatory record
with me (as well as others) while having an opening to counter-sue you
and take the shirt off your back and those who funded you all at the
same time. So give it your best shot, ponce! I have set a trap for you
and your handlers. Please allow me the supreme pleasure to skin you
and your handlers alive in my very own backyard. Besides you'd have to
prove wrongdoing and defamation at law to get your case off the
ground: and you cannot do that because Paul Hammond is indeed a
convicted paedophile!

Suck on that ;-)

W

[PaulHammond]

Post by NUR
"First, I do believe, based on Hammond's refusal to say why he is
interested in the Baha'i Faith and his frequent defense of the AO,
that he is probably working for them."
-- Eric Stetson, September 16, 2003

Nima, tell me.  What is May's real name and date of birth?

Her name is first: YOUR middle: WORST last: NIGHTMARE and her date of
birth is 06/06/66. Use the colloseum scene in Gladiator as your gauge
and think back long and hard. Maybe, then, you could figure out who
she is....

"Get your facts right. In English law YOU have to prove that what you write is true, >rather than the person you've targeted having to prove that you're wrong.

Well, I've proven Paul Hammond is a convicted paedophile. So game set
match to moi on this one!

Have you discovered whether this 57 year old man has the middle name
Andrew? Have you explained why you now DON'T believe that I was at
Keele University from 1989-93, or that Naz Ghanea-Hercock was one of
my contemporaries there?

And why should that matter? Since the trackrecord of your lies and
damn lies, beginning with the fact that you deny being a bahai, are
well documented, why is this remotely noteworthy? For all we know you
could be a seriel killer as well.

So, you think that if you accuse ME of being a convicted 57-year-old
collecter of child-porn, it doesn't actually matter whether you've got
your facts right or not?

Just throw lots of mud, and some of it might stick?

Sorry, but people with any regard for truth ought to have higher
standards than that - I'll remind you again:

"Get your facts right. In English law YOU have to prove that what you
write is true, rather than the person you've targeted having to prove
that you're wrong. And proving things in court can be a very difficult
and costly process."

Who is May?

My name is Paul Hammond, and I am 37 years old.

Paul

[Aor]

On Jun 2, 5:06 am, PaulHammond <***@onetel.net.uk> wrote:

"First, I do believe, based on Hammond's refusal to say why he is
interested in the Baha'i Faith and his frequent defense of the AO,
that he is probably working for them."

-- Eric Stetson, September 16, 2003

Post by PaulHammond
Who is May?

None of f-ing business, KKKunt.

Post by PaulHammond
My name is Paul Hammond, and I am 37 years old.

Bullshit! You have absolutely no proof that this is the case.


W

[All Bad]

"Aor" <***@gmail.com> wrote in message news:6cd4f9ba-5592-494d-a63a-***@z19g2000vbz.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 2, 5:06 am, PaulHammond <***@onetel.net.uk> wrote:

"First, I do believe, based on Hammond's refusal to say why he is
interested in the Baha'i Faith and his frequent defense of the AO,
that he is probably working for them."

-- Eric Stetson, September 16, 2003

Post by PaulHammond
Who is May?

WA: None of f-ing business, KKKunt.

Post by PaulHammond
My name is Paul Hammond, and I am 37 years old.

WA: Bullshit! You have absolutely no proof that this is the case.

AB: Eeedjit! Two years ago you insisted he did not live in the UK.
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.religion.bahai/msg/3769f9e5dcdeb787

AB: Then you cyber stalked him to confirm his story of this that and the
other thing. I recall it as some Baha'i club from Keele, majoring in maths
not so long ago from the perspective of a thirty something. Etc, etc.

http://groups.google.com/group/talk.religion.bahai/msg/f3eb89e049bfd8e0

http://groups.google.com/group/talk.religion.bahai/msg/b02cc6b905591031

http://deathtobahaism-whoisthelimeyparrot.blogspot.com/

AB: The 57 year old is obviously too old to be the Paul Hammond on TRB and
you have only glommed on to the old geezer because he is a sex pervert.


- All Bad

[Aor]

On Jun 2, 7:21 pm, "All Bad" <***@md.metrocast.net>
wrote:

Pat Kohli - CAUTION (Baha'i Internet Agency hack)


See,
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Pat_kohli


PAT KOHLI LIES ABOUT HIS IDENTITY ON SOURCEWATCH
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=User:Owen

"Rod Wicks on Pat Kohli"
http://groups.google.com.au/group/talk.religion.bahai/browse_thread/thread/196a2f4f90604439/0c3f3e62eb881985?q=rod+wicks+on+kkkholi&lnk=ol&

Post by All Bad
AB: The 57 year old is obviously too old to be the Paul Hammond on TRB and
you have only glommed on to the old geezer because he is a sex pervert.

Says who? You?? LOL!

[PaulHammond]

Post by NUR
"First, I do believe, based on Hammond's refusal to say why he is
interested in the Baha'i Faith and his frequent defense of the AO,
that he is probably working for them."
-- Eric Stetson, September 16, 2003

Eric retracted that statement. Back in 2003 when he was speculating
in private emails to ME about the state of your mental health.

Post by NUR

Post by PaulHammond
Who is May?

None of f-ing business, KKKunt.

Post by PaulHammond
My name is Paul Hammond, and I am 37 years old.

Bullshit! You have absolutely no proof that this is the case.

So, run that by me again?

If I ask you who May is that's "non of my fucking business"

But if I tell you who I am, I require proof of who I am before I'm
believed, and that IS your business?

Same old story, really, isn't it - one rule for people you like, and
another for people you like to smear.

Talk about hypocrisy on a gigantic scale!

[NUR]

Post by NUR
"First, I do believe, based on Hammond's refusal to say why he is
interested in the Baha'i Faith and his frequent defense of the AO,
that he is probably working for them."
-- Eric Stetson, September 16, 2003

Eric retracted that statement.  Back in 2003 when he was speculating
in private emails to ME about the state of your mental health.

Prove it.

[Aor]

On Jun 2, 5:06 am, PaulHammond <***@onetel.net.uk> wrote:

"First, I do believe, based on Hammond's refusal to say why he is
interested in the Baha'i Faith and his frequent defense of the AO,
that he is probably working for them."

-- Eric Stetson, September 16, 2003

Post by PaulHammond
So, you think that if you accuse ME of being a convicted 57-year-old
collecter of child-porn, it doesn't actually matter whether you've got
your facts right or not?

The facts say that Paul Hammond is convicted for child pornography.
There is no disputing those facts. QED

W

[PaulHammond]

Post by Aor

Post by PaulHammond
So, you think that if you accuse ME of being a convicted 57-year-old
collecter of child-porn, it doesn't actually matter whether you've got
your facts right or not?

The facts say that Paul Hammond is convicted for child pornography.
There is no disputing those facts. QED
W

This is pathetic sophism that shouldn't be indulged on such a serious
matter.

Do you say that *I* have a conviction for possession of child porn, or
do you not say this?

Because I was not yet born in 1969, and live nowhere near Luton or
Gravesend.

The person you refer to in the article you have dug up and thrown in
my face for the last week and a half is NOT me.

So let's get this straight with no sophism, and remember the
definition of defamation:

"Get your facts right. In English law YOU have to prove that what you
write is true, rather than the person you've targeted having to prove
that you're wrong. And proving things in court can be a very difficult
and costly process."

[NUR]

Post by PaulHammond

Post by Aor

Post by PaulHammond
So, you think that if you accuse ME of being a convicted 57-year-old
collecter of child-porn, it doesn't actually matter whether you've got
your facts right or not?

The facts say that Paul Hammond is convicted for child pornography.
There is no disputing those facts. QED
W

This is pathetic sophism that shouldn't be indulged on such a serious
matter.

Then stop indulging.

http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-174894130.html


Community order for internet pervert.


Biggleswade Chronicle (Biggleswade, England) | February 15, 2008


Former Gravenhurst man used the name Betty to access child porn.


An internet paedophile with a history of sex offences going back to
1969 has been given a three-year community order.


Paul Hammond, 57, had used the name "Betty" and "Betty Boop" while
collecting images from a smart group used by people distributing
child
pornography.


Luton Crown Court heard that, as part of an operation started in
2005, police obtained "Betty's" IP address and traced it to Hammond's
then home in Barton Road, Gravenhurst.


Prosecutor Simon Ash said officers raided the home in November ...


-


http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-175132217.html


from Luton Crown Court


An internet paedophile with a history of sex offences going back to
1969 has been given a three-year community order.


Paul Hammond, 57, had used the name 'Betty' and 'Betty Boop' while
collecting images from a smart group used by people distributing
child pornography.


Luton Crown Court heard on Friday that, as part of an operation
started in 2005, police obtained 'Betty's' IP address and traced it
to
Hammond's then home in Barton Road, Gravenhurst.


Prosecutor Simon Ash said officers raided the home in November 2006
and seized a laptop, ...

[PaulHammond]

Post by NUR

Post by PaulHammond

Post by Aor

Post by PaulHammond
So, you think that if you accuse ME of being a convicted 57-year-old
collecter of child-porn, it doesn't actually matter whether you've got
your facts right or not?

The facts say that Paul Hammond is convicted for child pornography.
There is no disputing those facts. QED
W

This is pathetic sophism that shouldn't be indulged on such a serious
matter.

Then stop indulging.

Do you say that *I* have a conviction for possession of child porn, or
do you not say this?

I notice THIS is a question that you could not give a straight answer
to last time.

Is THIS what you are alleging about ME, or not?

[NUR]

On Jun 8, 5:57 pm, PaulHammond <***@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
"First, I do believe, based on Hammond's refusal to say why he is
interested in the Baha'i Faith and his frequent defense of the AO,
that he is probably working for them."


-- Eric Stetson, September 16, 2003

Post by PaulHammond
Do you say that *I* have a conviction for possession of child porn, or
do you not say this?

http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-174894130.html


Community order for internet pervert.
Biggleswade Chronicle (Biggleswade, England) | February 15, 2008


Former Gravenhurst man used the name Betty to access child porn.


An internet paedophile with a history of sex offences going back to
1969 has been given a three-year community order.


Paul Hammond, 57, had used the name "Betty" and "Betty Boop" while
collecting images from a smart group used by people distributing
child
pornography.


Luton Crown Court heard that, as part of an operation started in
2005,
police obtained "Betty's" IP address and traced it to Hammond's then
home in Barton Road, Gravenhurst.


Prosecutor Simon Ash said officers raided the home in November ...


-


http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-175132217.html


from Luton Crown Court


An internet paedophile with a history of sex offences going back to
1969 has been given a three-year community order.


Paul Hammond, 57, had used the name 'Betty' and 'Betty Boop' while
collecting images from a smart group used by people distributing
child
pornography.


Luton Crown Court heard on Friday that, as part of an operation
started in 2005, police obtained 'Betty's' IP address and traced it
to
Hammond's then home in Barton Road, Gravenhurst.


Prosecutor Simon Ash said officers raided the home in November 2006
and seized a laptop, ...

[NUR]

Post by p***@onetel.net.uk
"Get your facts right. In English law YOU have to prove that what you
write is true, rather than the person you've targeted having to prove
that you're wrong. And proving things in court can be a very difficult
and costly process."

I'm not in England limey ponce. Duh!

[All Bad]

Post by d***@gmail.com
Long, long ago, I claimed that Paul Hammond was a Paedophile! Years
ago! And, of course, it turns out that HE IS!!!!

Long ago you said many things that turned out to be wrong, many other
things.

- All Bad

Post by d***@gmail.com
When will you stupid IGNORANT "BLIND" so-called Baha'is open up your
CLOSED MINDS, and see that you are DELUDED????

You will never, ever, ever see that you are deluded. There are none so
blind as him who can not see. You can't see that, can you? If you could
see, then you would not be deluded.

Post by d***@gmail.com
I wrote of Paul (after he had written that I wanted to have sex with
my mother, and that I should be gang-raped in jail by black men
because I didn't like Groids----poor blacks who hated whites and were
often violent against me when I did NOTHING but show them respect and
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you Liberal Paul,
Under the Law of God under Moses, Jesus, and Muhammed, adulterers
(like Mormon women) and sodomites (like your own butt buddies) would
have been stoned, or, in the case of Muhammad's day, had their
throats
CUT.
That was the Will of God. I see nowhere that this will not be the
case
in the World Order of Baha'u'llah. The fee to the House of Justice
for
hearing the case is not the punishment, but the fine. It is up to the
Universal House of Justice to set the punishments.
Of course, if they have people like you on it, they'll be charging
small fines for men who bugger boys.
Darrick Evenson
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[NUR]

Post by All Bad
Long ago you said many things that turned out to be wrong, many other
things.
- All Bad

You shut your stinkin', brown-nose war-criminal gob!


http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Pat_kohli

Pat Kohli, or Patrick Kohli, is a member of the Haifan Baha'i Faith[1]
who makes regular contributions to the USENET newsgroup
talk.religion.bahai[2]. He is a computer programmer who has worked on
software for various projects, including military systems.

Contents [hide]
1 Background
2 Articles and Resources
2.1 Related SourceWatch Articles
2.2 References
2.3 External Articles

[edit]Background
He "is a computer scientist assigned to 4.5.3.3. He works for PMA-231
as the Open Architecture (OA) IPT lead, in the OA/FORCEnet IPT of the
Network Centric Warfare IPT. Prior to this he worked at Saint Inigoes
for 4.5 and developed a prototype next generation flight data
recorder, using COTS components, to meet incident reporting,
maintenance and FOQA needs. Pat also supported the old PMA-282 which
did weapon control systems for guided missiles. Pat has an MS in
computer Information Systems from Florida Tech." [3]

"Pat Kohli, NCW Open Architecture Lead, demonstrated how the E-2/C-2
program office (PMA-231) is continuously evaluating and implementing
software modernization to facilitate transition of the existing E-2
operational flight program to an environment using commercially
available systems. Venlet said, "The Naval Aviation Enterprise has
embraced open architecture as a fundamental building block of weapon
system development from its very inception. Our government/industry
teams continue to leverage these open system strategies and concepts
in achieving reduction in overall development cycle times and
delivering increased system capabilities to the Fleet faster and
cheaper. The advantages of integrating open architecture designs and
contracting strategies are measurable and pronounced as is
substantiated by our E-2D Advanced Hawkeye and P-8 Multi-Mission
Aircraft development programs. The key to continued success will be
maintaining the close partnership with industry experts, as we provide
the right capabilities, at the right time and right cost to the joint
warfighter."The E-2 Hawkeye team has been representing and directly
supporting Venlet's executive office - the aviation domain lead for
open architecture initiatives - since June 2004, because of its role
as a battle management command and control platform and a central
network communications node in aviation. E-2 Program Manager Capt.
Randy Mahrsaid, "Today's evolving E-2 open architecture model paves
the way for a more mature system to be used by the E-2D prior to it
taking its place in the fleet."[3]

Pat Kohli has maintained a consistent web presence since the late
1990s, particularly on USENET, addressing both external critics and
dissenters within the Haifan Baha'i Faith tradition to which he
belongs [5]. In 1998, he voted against the creation of the USENET
group, talk.religion.bahai, as an un-moderated discussion forum for
issues relating to the Baha'i faith [4]. Official discussion regarding
the creation of this group may also be found at: [6]. He posts under
the handles Mr All Bad and All_Bad [5]

[edit]Articles and Resources
[edit]Related SourceWatch Articles
PMA Group
[edit]References
$B",(B Letter from Assistant Secretary, Kishan Manocha, on Behalf of
National Spiritual Assembly of the Baha'is of the United Kingdom [1],
dated October 8, 2002, Accessed 17 February, 2009.
$B",(B Discussion Archive of USENET group Talk.Religion.Baha'i, [2],
Accessed February 17, 2009
$B",(B 3.0 3.1 Drema Ballengee-Grunst, "Assistant SecNav visits NAVAIR T&E
laboratory", November 10, 2005.
$B",(B Record of votes cast regarding the creation of the USENET group,
talk.religion.bahai,[3], Accessed February 17, 2009.
$B",(B Excerpt from USENET group talk.religion.bahai,[4], Accessed February
17, 2009.
[edit]External Articles

Retrieved from "http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Pat_Kohli"
Categories: United States | Religion | Military | War/peace

[p***@onetel.net.uk]

Post by NUR

Post by All Bad
Long ago you said many things that turned out to be wrong, many other
things.
- All Bad

You shut your stinkin', brown-nose war-criminal gob!

No - you shut YOUR stinking, lying, shit-eating gob!

Post by NUR
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Pat_kohli

This article doesn't actually call Pat Kholi a war criminal, does it?
What a liar!