Baha'i Censorship - See Website
2006-04-18 13:26:51 UTC
Kalimát Press Petition
http://www.fglaysher.com/bahaicensorship/
Background Information on the Kalimát Press Petition
The Bahá'í Faith is perceived by most people - Bahá'ís and non-Bahá'ís - as
a generally liberal religion, far closer to the Unitarian-Universalists than
to the Southern Baptists. Yet over the last 30-40 years the governing
institutions of the Bahá'í Faith have become ever more conservative in
nature and in many ways are adopting strict control mechanisms on Bahá'ís to
maintain a form of Bahá'í fundamentalism.
Bahá'í fundamentalism is an odd development. The scriptures of the Bahá'í
Faith are generally progressive - calling for cooperation and understanding
among faith communities, equality of the sexes, promotion of the oneness of
humanity, the harmony of science and religion, the elimination of extremes
of wealth and poverty, support of the United Nations and international
order. In contrast to this liberal dimension, the Bahá'í community,
especially through its conservative administrative order, promotes
theocracy, forbids women to serve on the highest elected offices of the
religion, defines homosexuality as a psychological disorder, forbids Bahá'ís
to join progressive groups like Amnesty International or the Interfaith
Alliance, requires Bahá'ís to stay aloof from controversial political
issues, requires mandatory pre-publication censorship of all that individual
Bahá'ís seek to publish about their faith, has implemented internal spying
on suspected believers, exercises administrative expulsion of Baha'is, and
threatens shunning of Bahá'ís who are targeted as "internal enemies."
Kalimát Press has been a leader in Bahá'í publishing since its founding in
1978. It has experienced a series of conflicts with the Bahá'í
administration over its attempt to publish academic studies of the Babi and
Bahá'í religions. Although Kalimát Press has faithfully followed the demand
of the Bahá'í administration to submit all works by Bahá'ís to
pre-publication censorship, the process of pre-publication review and
censorship has created tension between Kalimát Press and the National
Spiritual Assembly of the United States. The Universal House of Justice, the
international head of the Bahá'í Faith based in Haifa, Israel, has been
drawn into these disputes and has also expressed its dissatisfaction with
Kalimát Press's agenda to foster Bahá'í studies.
Besides works by Bahá'ís published under the Kalimát Press imprint, other
academic books from Bahá'í and non-Bahá'í publishers are distributed by
Kalimát to their main market: the American Bahá'í community. These
distributed titles include books on Islam and Iran. A handful of books
written by non-Bahá'ís, former Bahá'ís, or liberal Bahá'ís published by
university presses or self-published has triggered the National Spiritual
Assembly's call for a boycott of all Kalimát Press titles.
The offending titles appear to be the following:
1.
Juan Cole's Modernity and the Millennium: The Genesis of the Bahá'í
Faith in the 19th-Century Middle East (Columbia University Press).
2.
Abbas Amanat, Resurrection and Renewal: The Making of the Babi
Movement in Iran, 1844-1850 (Cornell University Press).
3.
William Garlington, The Bahá'í Faith in America (Praeger Publisher).
4.
Sen McGlinn, Church and State: A Postmodern Political Theology. Book
One (self published, MA thesis, University of Leiden).
All of these books have received positive reviews and are not particularly
radical. Each of them does however rub against popular Bahá'í beliefs and
the favorite theological views of conservative members of the Bahá'í
leadership. For example, Sen McGlinn's book provides an exhaustive
examination of Bahá'í texts, from Bahá'u'lláh to Shoghi Effendi, on
Church-State relations and makes the case that the Bahá'í founders did not
expect a Bahá'í theocracy to emerge in some distant future. Mr. McGlinn was
subsequently expelled from the Bahá'í community by the Universal House of
Justice for publishing his research. The Universal House of Justice
complained that the author was attempting to impose his theology on the Bahá'í
community. McGlinn was expelled from the Bahá'í community without a hearing
or any semblance of due process.
Shortly after the expulsion of Mr. McGlinn, the boycott of Kalimát Press was
announced.
For more background on Bahá'í fundamentalism and the liberal-conservative
debates within the Bahá'í community, see the following articles available on
the web:
1.
Karen Bacquet. "Enemies Within: Conflict and Control in the Bahá'í
Community" Cultic Studies Journal. Vol. 18 (2001): 140-171.
2.
Juan Cole, "The Bahá'í Faith in America as Panopticon, 1963-1997"
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 37, No. 2 (June 1998):
234-248
3.
Juan Cole, "Fundamentalism in the Contemporary US Bahá'í Community"
Review of Religious Research, Vol. 43, no. 3 (March, 2002):195-217.
You are invited to read and sign the petition.
http://www.petitiononline.com/cgi-bin/mlk?http://bahaisonline.net/petition
http://www.fglaysher.com/bahaicensorship/
Background Information on the Kalimát Press Petition
The Bahá'í Faith is perceived by most people - Bahá'ís and non-Bahá'ís - as
a generally liberal religion, far closer to the Unitarian-Universalists than
to the Southern Baptists. Yet over the last 30-40 years the governing
institutions of the Bahá'í Faith have become ever more conservative in
nature and in many ways are adopting strict control mechanisms on Bahá'ís to
maintain a form of Bahá'í fundamentalism.
Bahá'í fundamentalism is an odd development. The scriptures of the Bahá'í
Faith are generally progressive - calling for cooperation and understanding
among faith communities, equality of the sexes, promotion of the oneness of
humanity, the harmony of science and religion, the elimination of extremes
of wealth and poverty, support of the United Nations and international
order. In contrast to this liberal dimension, the Bahá'í community,
especially through its conservative administrative order, promotes
theocracy, forbids women to serve on the highest elected offices of the
religion, defines homosexuality as a psychological disorder, forbids Bahá'ís
to join progressive groups like Amnesty International or the Interfaith
Alliance, requires Bahá'ís to stay aloof from controversial political
issues, requires mandatory pre-publication censorship of all that individual
Bahá'ís seek to publish about their faith, has implemented internal spying
on suspected believers, exercises administrative expulsion of Baha'is, and
threatens shunning of Bahá'ís who are targeted as "internal enemies."
Kalimát Press has been a leader in Bahá'í publishing since its founding in
1978. It has experienced a series of conflicts with the Bahá'í
administration over its attempt to publish academic studies of the Babi and
Bahá'í religions. Although Kalimát Press has faithfully followed the demand
of the Bahá'í administration to submit all works by Bahá'ís to
pre-publication censorship, the process of pre-publication review and
censorship has created tension between Kalimát Press and the National
Spiritual Assembly of the United States. The Universal House of Justice, the
international head of the Bahá'í Faith based in Haifa, Israel, has been
drawn into these disputes and has also expressed its dissatisfaction with
Kalimát Press's agenda to foster Bahá'í studies.
Besides works by Bahá'ís published under the Kalimát Press imprint, other
academic books from Bahá'í and non-Bahá'í publishers are distributed by
Kalimát to their main market: the American Bahá'í community. These
distributed titles include books on Islam and Iran. A handful of books
written by non-Bahá'ís, former Bahá'ís, or liberal Bahá'ís published by
university presses or self-published has triggered the National Spiritual
Assembly's call for a boycott of all Kalimát Press titles.
The offending titles appear to be the following:
1.
Juan Cole's Modernity and the Millennium: The Genesis of the Bahá'í
Faith in the 19th-Century Middle East (Columbia University Press).
2.
Abbas Amanat, Resurrection and Renewal: The Making of the Babi
Movement in Iran, 1844-1850 (Cornell University Press).
3.
William Garlington, The Bahá'í Faith in America (Praeger Publisher).
4.
Sen McGlinn, Church and State: A Postmodern Political Theology. Book
One (self published, MA thesis, University of Leiden).
All of these books have received positive reviews and are not particularly
radical. Each of them does however rub against popular Bahá'í beliefs and
the favorite theological views of conservative members of the Bahá'í
leadership. For example, Sen McGlinn's book provides an exhaustive
examination of Bahá'í texts, from Bahá'u'lláh to Shoghi Effendi, on
Church-State relations and makes the case that the Bahá'í founders did not
expect a Bahá'í theocracy to emerge in some distant future. Mr. McGlinn was
subsequently expelled from the Bahá'í community by the Universal House of
Justice for publishing his research. The Universal House of Justice
complained that the author was attempting to impose his theology on the Bahá'í
community. McGlinn was expelled from the Bahá'í community without a hearing
or any semblance of due process.
Shortly after the expulsion of Mr. McGlinn, the boycott of Kalimát Press was
announced.
For more background on Bahá'í fundamentalism and the liberal-conservative
debates within the Bahá'í community, see the following articles available on
the web:
1.
Karen Bacquet. "Enemies Within: Conflict and Control in the Bahá'í
Community" Cultic Studies Journal. Vol. 18 (2001): 140-171.
2.
Juan Cole, "The Bahá'í Faith in America as Panopticon, 1963-1997"
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 37, No. 2 (June 1998):
234-248
3.
Juan Cole, "Fundamentalism in the Contemporary US Bahá'í Community"
Review of Religious Research, Vol. 43, no. 3 (March, 2002):195-217.
You are invited to read and sign the petition.
http://www.petitiononline.com/cgi-bin/mlk?http://bahaisonline.net/petition