Discussion:
Eric Stetson on Paul Hammond September 2003
(too old to reply)
Ruhaniya
2009-02-13 03:12:36 UTC
Permalink
"First, I do believe, based on Hammond's refusal to say why he is
interested in the Baha'i Faith and his frequent defense of the AO,
that he is probably working for them."

-- Eric Stetson, September 2003
Ruhaniya
2009-02-20 10:58:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ruhaniya
"First, I do believe, based on Hammond's refusal to say why he is
interested in the Baha'i Faith and his frequent defense of the AO,
that he is probably working for them."
-- Eric Stetson, September 2003
Aor
2009-02-21 05:07:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ruhaniya
"First, I do believe, based on Hammond's refusal to say why he is
interested in the Baha'i Faith and his frequent defense of the AO,
that he is probably working for them."
-- Eric Stetson, September 2003
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Pat_kohli
2009-02-22 06:23:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ruhaniya
"First, I do believe, based on Hammond's refusal to say why he is
interested in the Baha'i Faith and his frequent defense of the AO,
that he is probably working for them."
-- Eric Stetson, September 2003- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Aor
2009-02-24 13:11:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ruhaniya
"First, I do believe, based on Hammond's refusal to say why he is
interested in the Baha'i Faith and his frequent defense of the AO,
that he is probably working for them."
-- Eric Stetson, September 2003
Ruhaniya
2009-02-25 04:21:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ruhaniya
"First, I do believe, based on Hammond's refusal to say why he is
interested in the Baha'i Faith and his frequent defense of the AO,
that he is probably working for them."
-- Eric Stetson, September 2003
Ruhaniya
2009-02-26 00:32:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ruhaniya
"First, I do believe, based on Hammond's refusal to say why he is
interested in the Baha'i Faith and his frequent defense of the AO,
that he is probably working for them."
-- Eric Stetson, September 2003
Loading...